Interviews are Lead (Pb) not Gold (Au)
by Derrick ParkhurstDownload: Slides, Audio Podcast
Interviews are an incredibly useful method for studying the user experience. However, there are a few major things to remember about interviews.
-
where we are particularly interested in how the user perceives what
happened. What the user perceives can be quite different than what
actually happened. Both are part of the user experience, but the primary
goal of interviews is to extract the user's perceptual experience.
-
It is easy for the interviewer to get so invested in the success of the
product that they allow this investment to bias the way in which they ask
questions in an interview. Interviewer bias is present anytime a question
is asked in a way that precludes a particular response. For example,
consider the following question. Can you tell me how much you liked our
newest website feature, tabbed navigation? Instead, the question should be
asked in a non-directed fashion and focus on the user's immediate
experience. Can you tell me about your use of the tabbed navigation on the
website?
-
Users won't always tell you what they believe. Sometimes they will do this
to avoid conflict. Sometimes, they will do this so that they can look
smart. Users will often answer questions that you didn't ask and
completely ignore your question. Maybe your question just isn't
interesting to them. Users like to talk, but about interesting things.
Users might not know the answer to your question, and so they make one up.
Interviewer: What did you think about the tabbed navigation? Interviewee:
(Tabbed navigation, what's that?) Oh that was really easy to use, no
problem. This can also be true when you ask about an opinion that has not
had enough time to be fully formed.
Like I said, interviews are an increadibly useful method for studying the user experience. However, in order to turn transcripts (PB) into recommendations (Au) you need to think about these three things.
